Plaintiff Moves for Very Early Summary Judgment in Case Against Zazzle Alleging It Profited from Stolen Fonts, Says Bartko Law Firm

Bartko Legislation Agency delivers pretty early MSJ towards Zazzle as to legal responsibility on all statements in the scenario the place it is alleged that Zazzle produced hundreds of hundreds of thousands in profits by thieving the software for a person of its most popular fonts from famed designer

SAN FRANCISCO, September 22, 2022–(Enterprise WIRE)–Late previous night, one of the world’s major graphic designers filed a pretty early motion for partial summary judgment—less than a month immediately after the lawsuit was filed—against internet style and design and printing large, Zazzle, Inc., in a situation in which she alleges that Zazzle cheated her company out of its mental home, which authorized Zazzle to earn hundreds of thousands and thousands of pounds in unwell-gotten profits.

Nicky Laatz, a person of the major custom made high quality font designers in the world, filed this action just a lot less than a thirty day period back, on August 24, 2022 in US District Courtroom for the Northern District of California, alleging that Zazzle fraudulently and secretly received the software program for her Blooming Sophisticated Trio of fonts for use on Zazzle’s website.

Link to lawsuits: https://www.bzbm.com/wp-written content/uploads/2022/08/Laatz-v.-Zazzle-Criticism-8-24-22.pdf

Url to Motion for Summary Judgment Against Zazzle: https://www.bzbm.com/wp-content material/uploads/2022/09/Laatz-v.-Zazzle-Ps-MSJ-09-21-2022.pdf

The scenario asserts that Zazzle instructed its senior network engineer to pose as an person designer and acquire a one-person license for the Blooming Stylish Trio of fonts, but in actuality the fonts have been acquired for Zazzle’s unlawful use. Nicky Laatz further more asserts that Zazzle then loaded the computer software onto its servers and manufactured the fonts obtainable to approximately 100 million Zazzle designers, people, and customers without permission or payment to the designer.

Nicky Laatz offers licenses to these premium fonts for $17 for every person on her website and $20 for every consumer overCreative Market. The circumstance asserts that her Blooming Stylish Trio of fonts immediately became some of the most well-known fonts on Zazzle, the enterprise was able to receive hundreds of hundreds of thousands of pounds in earnings from its illegal use of the fonts, and stay clear of having to pay hundreds of tens of millions of pounds in licensing costs, with zero payment to Mrs. Laatz.

The match seeks disgorgement of all of Zazzle’s earnings from the unlawful use of Laatz’s hugely common Blooming Tasteful Trio of fonts, and recovery of the missing licensing earnings linked to Zazzle creating the fonts available to its virtually 100 million designers, users, and prospects. Promises in the scenario contain fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment, promissory fraud, intentional interference with deal, as perfectly as copyright and trademark infringement.

“Zazzle’s perform against Nicky Laatz was brazen and with no remorse. This is just one of the clearest slash circumstances of fraud that I’ve ever found in my far more than 20 decades of working towards legislation,” reported Ms. Laatz’s guide trial counsel, Patrick M. Ryan of the Bartko legislation agency. “When I file a case like this a person in which the proof of the Defendant’s wrongdoing is conclusive from the start off, I you should not hesitate in bringing an early summary judgment movement on behalf of the target,” mentioned Mr. Ryan. “I have previously successfully moved for summary judgment at the pretty begin of cases on behalf of plaintiffs in federal court docket,” claimed Mr. Ryan. “And below, due to the fact the proof is so effective and dispositive in opposition to Zazzle, our staff is inquiring the Court docket to promptly locate Zazzle liable for fraud, copyright infringement, and tortious interference, which will leave only the challenges of damages and disgorgement of revenue to be afterwards tried using to the jury.” Mr. Ryan explained: “Set simply, when you’ve got bought the goods versus a poor actor like Zazzle, you can find no rationale to hold out to existing your situation to the Courtroom.”

Zazzle, dependent in Menlo Park, is one of the most productive on-line marketplaces for designers hunting to develop and provide a extensive range of custom made items including invites, business cards, getaway and greeting cards, outfits, artwork, and business materials, to the community .

Zazzle is reportedly planning for an IPO that would worth it at up to $2 billion. Yet, although the firm raked in millions in earnings from the unauthorized use of Laatz’s intellectual house for additional than five decades, she obtained not a one cent in royalties from Zazzle.

“Zazzle … is designed on a lie that it supports, encourages, and fairly compensates artists and designers for their inventive function. In actuality, Zazzle’s superior valuation and hundreds of hundreds of thousands of dollars in annual revenue are mostly because of to the mental assets of designers whom Zazzle has been stolen from and unsuccessful to correctly compensate, if at all,” according to the lawsuit submitted on August 24, 2022.

Nicky Laatz, centered in the Uk, cautiously developed the Blooming Sophisticated Trio of fonts to be an particularly balanced and pleasing handwriting-style of fonts, and they are extensively thought of by designers to be between the very best such fonts accessible. Without a doubt, their status and acceptance was this kind of that Zazzle actively promoted the fonts by title, and Blooming Sophisticated immediately grew to become detailed as the #2 script font by Zazzle commencing over a few a long time in the past.

The grievance alleges that the Blooming Exquisite Trio of fonts are the most well-known fonts with Zazzle’s most successful graphic designers who have their individual online storefronts on Zazzle’s web-site and whose perform is featured among Zazzle’s most preferred patterns and items.

The Blooming Stylish Trio proved particularly rewarding for Zazzle. These fonts turned the significant style and design ingredient in innumerable hugely common things by some of Zazzle’s most prosperous designers, like 10 of Zazzle’s 24 most well-liked company card layouts and a lot of of its prime marriage invites. Many of Zazzle’s greatest-earning designers, who earn hundreds of countless numbers of bucks or a lot more a calendar year on Zazzle, relied on the fonts for a considerable portion of their merchandise offerings.

Two a long time back, in late August 2020, Laatz found the deception when a Zazzle person contacted her for support with employing the fonts on the Zazzle site. Shocked, Laatz demanded that Zazzle stop supplying her fonts to its designers and clients. She also demanded that Zazzle supply her with a entire listing of products and solutions developed on and/or offered by its web page that utilized her fonts, and a total accounting of the firm’s revenues and income from the illegitimate use of her mental property.

Still the corporation not only refused her needs, it continued to openly offer the Blooming Stylish Trio of fonts under their personal name, for which Ms. Laatz has a registered trademark, right until previously this month, when Zazzle inexplicably changed the Blooming Classy Trio of fonts with affordable imitations, 1 of which was copied from Blooming Sophisticated alone – extending the harm to Zazzle’s individual designers and users who are also victims of the fraud.

About the Bartko law business

Bartko, established much more than 40 years ago, is a boutique regulation business specializing in countrywide and worldwide sophisticated litigation and investigations, as very well as true estate and franchising transactions.

It is a 40-plus-attorney firm dedicated to strategic cutting-edge illustration of consumers in California, nationally, and internationally. Bartko’s follow places consist of symbolizing both equally plaintiffs and defendants in complicated business enterprise litigation, antitrust and level of competition claims, intellectual home litigation, trade secret litigation, anticounterfeiting, intricate work litigation, employment/labor strategic information and collective bargaining, as nicely as genuine estate litigation, amongst other folks.

Bartko’s direct demo counsel in this case is Patrick M. Ryan, who is one particular of the most effective trial attorneys in the United States. The latest victories incorporate: (1) performing as co-direct counsel in defending Sutter Wellbeing from antitrust allegations by course motion plaintiffs in the Northern District of California where by, right after a 5-week trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Sutter Wellbeing and against the plaintiffs who sought $411 million in damages, which would have been subject matter to trebling (2) lead counsel for the plaintiff in a trade secret circumstance in Santa Clara County, California, in which he attained a just about $900 Million jury verdict on behalf of a big worldwide engineering business.

In 2020, Patrick was named a Major Trade Mystery Law firm for 2020 by the California Everyday Journal. As a final result of 1 of his jury verdicts, Bartko was ranked as Selection 3 in the Best 100 Verdicts—published by The Nationwide Regulation Journal (June 2019)—and having the maximum rated intellectual property victory in the United States for that yr. And the California Daily Journal’s Best Verdicts publication named Patrick’s circumstance the best Intellectual Assets and Trade Insider secrets victory in California and the Quantity 2 maximum judgment total for 2019.

As section of his apply, Patrick allows corporations far better protect their intellectual home and coordinates investigations into potential IP theft for companies accused of stealing trade strategies and for firms that might have been the victims of this sort of theft. In this circumstance, Patrick seeks to vindicate the rights of an crucial artist whose IP was stolen and exploited by Zazzle.

Co-counsel Stephen Steinberg is a demo lawyer at Bartko specializing in representing technologies companies in disputes involving mental assets and other intricate small business issues, such as claims for theft of trade insider secrets, trademark and copyright infringement, and disputes involving startups and founders. He routinely represents equally plaintiffs and defendants in these circumstances, and counsels businesses on how to protect their mental house from rivals and how to keep away from promises by opponents against them. He next-chaired the trial in the aforementioned trade top secret scenario that led to a virtually $900 Million jury verdict that was rated as one of the biggest in 2019.

Co-counsel Chris Gribble is a trial attorney at Bartko specializing in mental home and intricate business enterprise litigation. His broader experience incorporates federal legal defense, patent litigation, serious estate litigation, environmental legislation, securities litigation, founder disputes, and corporate governance litigation. He has represented clients of all dimensions across all issue issues by all stages of litigation. He has initially-chair trial and arbitration practical experience and has been element of numerous demo groups equally in California and out of state. Even though underutilized in his daily exercise, Chris has a master’s diploma in Chemistry from UC Berkeley.

Co-counsel Casey Mathews is a litigation associate at Bartko with intensive experience representing purchasers in a broad array of elaborate commercial litigation, which includes, between other spots, contract disputes and corporate governance litigation. He has represented a huge range of consumers through nearly all stages of litigation, from pleadings and dispositive motions as a result of demo. He has particularly apt working experience with promises for intentional interference with contracts, having performed considerable study on the topic in link with the drafting and publication of the third restatement of torts.

Zazzle’s Counsel

Zazzle hired the law business, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, to test and defend its actions against Mrs. laatz. In accordance to its have web-site, “Quinn Emanuel is the just one legislation company in the planet that main providers the very least want to see as opposing counsel…. All those interviewed have been requested to identify the regulation agency they minimum wanted to see as opposing counsel. Quinn Emanuel rated quantity one as the most feared.” (Emphasis added.) But Mrs. Laatz’s lawyers have encounter in dealing with Quinn Emanuel’s ways and look forward to vindicating her rights in opposition to Zazzle and its law company. The Quinn Emanuel Attorneys arrayed in opposition to Mrs. Laatz are: Rachel M. Kassabian, Andrew H. Shapiro, Daniel C. Posner, and Olga Slobodyanyuk.

Perspective resource version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/household/20220922005840/en/

Contacts

Sam Singer
Singer Associates Community Relations
[email protected]
Cell: 415.336.4949

Maria Flores

Next Post

8 million student loan borrowers will get automatic forgiveness

Thu Sep 29 , 2022
Leopatrizi | E+ | Getty Visuals As part of President Joe Biden’s historic college student financial loan forgiveness strategy, up to 8 million folks could get automated personal debt reduction, in accordance to the White Dwelling. Throughout the board, most individuals with federal university student debt will be qualified for some […]